-
Archives
- September 2021
- August 2021
- February 2020
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2017
- November 2017
- July 2017
- January 2017
- November 2016
- May 2016
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- March 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- December 2010
-
Meta
Author Archives: pilkingtonphil
Short-Period and Long-Period Analysis: Neoclassical Versus Historical
In my previous post I was concerned with summarising Lawson’s argument regarding the term “neoclassical” for an audience that was not going to read his paper in full. Thus, I did not wish to insert too much of my own … Continue reading
Posted in Economic Theory, Philosophy
Leave a comment
What is Neoclassical Economics? And Are Many Heterodox Economists Actually Neoclassical?
After my recent post on a paper by Tony Lawson I was corresponding with the author and he suggested that I might want to take a look at a paper he has written that will be coming out in the … Continue reading
Posted in Economic Theory, Philosophy
8 Comments
The Idiocy of the “Evolutionary” Paradigm in Psychology
In the wake of the financial meltdown a lot of economists are turning to the discipline of evolutionary psychology for answers. Evolutionary psychology basically attempts to explain human psychology in terms of adaptive evolutionary principles. So, a person does X … Continue reading
Posted in Psychology
7 Comments
Tending to His Own Garden: Has Krugman Finally Turned on the ISLM?
In a recent post Paul Krugman, as part of an ongoing debate with MMT/MMR advocate Cullen Roche, has said that the ISLM is not a good approach to macroeconomics. Hurrah! Right? Well, maybe not. In fact, New Keynesians do not … Continue reading
Posted in Economic Theory
5 Comments
Mathesis Universalis: Lawson’s Criticisms Fall Short of their Real Target
Lars Syll has linked to a really interesting paper by Tony Lawson amidst a discussion about maths and modelling in economics. The paper really is worth a read in its entirety. It is entitled Mathematical Modelling and Ideology in the Economics … Continue reading
Posted in Economic Theory, Philosophy
Leave a comment
Swimming Against the Tide of History: Krugman-Galbraith ’96
Lars Syll has brought my attention to a very interesting exchange between Jamie Galbraith and Paul Krugman from 1996 that is archived on the latter’s website (or a website created for him, I cannot tell). Much of the discussion is … Continue reading
Posted in Economic History, Economic Theory, Media/Journalism
9 Comments
Naked and Free, Economics Without Models: A Response to Grasselli
Well, Grasselli has responded to my previous post. His response, full as it is with personal attacks, bile and insinuations is pretty embarrassing; Grasselli hasn’t yet learned that a rapid, heated exchange on Facebook is a little different from a … Continue reading
Posted in Economic Theory, Market Analysis
1 Comment
Inflation and Income Distribution: A Reply to the Vulgar Keynesian Policy Enthusiasts
Noah Smith has a recent post on inflation in which he urges economists to learn to love inflation. We live, as everyone knows, in a period of low inflation and high unemployment and I suppose Smith’s point is that we … Continue reading
Posted in Economic Policy, Politics
1 Comment
Brain-Slug Economics: Grasselli’s Project to Turn Post-Keynesian Economics into Mathematical Formalism
The danger when mathematicians try to do economic modelling is twofold. The first problem is that they often do not have a clue about what they are doing or the object that they are trying to model. The second problem … Continue reading
Posted in Economic Theory
5 Comments
Micro to Macro: A Note on the Kahn Wage-Profit Multiplier
Just a quick added note on the Kahn wage-profit multiplier. As shown in the last piece, Kahn’s multiplier was concerned with the generation of employment by each extra man employed. Here once again is the complete multiplier relation (read the … Continue reading
Posted in Economic Theory
Leave a comment
Fixing the Economists 